Deeseet, the loser.
Apparently good old fashioned honesty and criticism cannot be exercised these days without some loser retorting, blocking and then making no sense out of things. I'm referring to the user who goes by deeseet and a video that he has uploaded: https://xhamster.com/videos/flying-cum-shot-on-back-22-year-old-girl-1659192
I stumbled upon this video in a routine browsing and gave it a brief watch. In this video, it is apparent that this place is a complete pigsty and because of that, I was turned off by it and simply commented on the disgusting condition of this "home". I said:
"Nice content, but what a pigsty of a home!"
This was actually a compliment to the actual sexual content, but a note of the condition of the so-called "home".
I was corrected by this user, by him making it clear to me that it was NOT a home, yet given NO clarification of what this place then actually was/is. He replies:
"...He thinks it's a "home". heh heh"
and:
"Who ever said it was a home?"
So naturally, I wrote out a respectful reply and described to him this, before attempting to send it:
"You make a valid point and it was assumed by me that it was a home by the video's scenery (carpeting, structural layout, doors missing from it's existing hinges, hallway/rooms [closet?] with clothes hanging, etc...). It doesn't appear to be a commercial building or business. One main fact that hasn't changed is that no matter what sort of dwelling this may be, it still remains a pigsty. Take note that I actually complimented to the content of the video. If it isn't a home, would you then care to explain what this place is to us all?"
As I went to hit the 'Leave A Comment' button, it couldn't get pushed through because this loser actually blocked me. Tell me this makes any sense that someone would ask a question, but then go on to block me from being able to answer it. Smh! He'll now be on public blast for this and I'm sure wamia will have a field day with this one.
I stumbled upon this video in a routine browsing and gave it a brief watch. In this video, it is apparent that this place is a complete pigsty and because of that, I was turned off by it and simply commented on the disgusting condition of this "home". I said:
"Nice content, but what a pigsty of a home!"
This was actually a compliment to the actual sexual content, but a note of the condition of the so-called "home".
I was corrected by this user, by him making it clear to me that it was NOT a home, yet given NO clarification of what this place then actually was/is. He replies:
"...He thinks it's a "home". heh heh"
and:
"Who ever said it was a home?"
So naturally, I wrote out a respectful reply and described to him this, before attempting to send it:
"You make a valid point and it was assumed by me that it was a home by the video's scenery (carpeting, structural layout, doors missing from it's existing hinges, hallway/rooms [closet?] with clothes hanging, etc...). It doesn't appear to be a commercial building or business. One main fact that hasn't changed is that no matter what sort of dwelling this may be, it still remains a pigsty. Take note that I actually complimented to the content of the video. If it isn't a home, would you then care to explain what this place is to us all?"
As I went to hit the 'Leave A Comment' button, it couldn't get pushed through because this loser actually blocked me. Tell me this makes any sense that someone would ask a question, but then go on to block me from being able to answer it. Smh! He'll now be on public blast for this and I'm sure wamia will have a field day with this one.
6年前
