tropicdayz

This is more about the ladies than about me to be honest.

I post A to D tier Nordic celebrities, nude models or even the occasional vintage Big Brother thotties on a highly irregular basis. That said, I reserve the right and freedom to post a dwarf at any given moment

If I'm bored, I'll sometimes randomly accept friend requests, but there's literally nothing to gain from requesting it. I'm not really interested in the social media side of porn, the inbox is open to all and I won't hide content behind passwords anyway.

----

Being aware of the annoying experience of scrolling through 10 pages of a hot amateur to get to the nudes only to find that they're all social media pics, I decided to develop an advanced and sophisticated method to combat this. I apply a 'non-nude' description in the headline if the lady is not fully naked in at least one picture..

Topless in a bikini bottom fex is not naked (I would die on this hill). Topless with the back facing the camera? Nice try, but no 'topless' status. Bottomless but with a bra on does also not qualify the strict rules for naked although here this depends on the presence of punani and to which degree.
Furthermore, A picture where the lady is all naked but also has a large pillow (or other undesired objects) in front to cover up, is considered the same as fully clothed.
-This also applies for unreasonable body part coverage such as a 23 pic large set of "nudes" where all the vital parts are covered in every god damn picture. (There should be trigger warnings for that stuff.)

------

Despite the in depth sophisticated quantum based system capable of distinguishing a 'not really naked' pic/vid from fully naked, I tend to forget to add '(non-nude)' anyway. I blame the algorithms.